Notes

I've always struggled with impulse control, and tried researching and coming up with questions to ask myself before making purchases. However, they usually don't work, because the questions are usually too broad, and don't address the specific purchases I'm contemplating.


TLDR: Amazon pays roughly 70% of retail price for books priced up to $9.99, and 35% for books $10 and over. Amazon is the only retailer that does this. Other retailers, I make somewhere around 65%-70% no matter the retail price. Everything follows from that math, but if you want the details read on.

😮


If you are using Firefox and are annoyed by PDFs being downloaded automatically then you need to adjust browser.download.open_pdf_attachments_inline to true. Just enter about:config in the address bar and toggle the setting.

found via A comment by shscs911


Nur für den Fall, dass jemand es noch nicht woanders gesehen hat. 🙂


MacOS shows the App Switcher by default only on the display where the Dock was last displayed. If you're using a multi monitor setup this is, at least for me, a little bit annoying. I couldn't find any setting in the UI for changing this behaviour. Thankfully it can be done using the CLI.

To display the App switcher on all monitors you need to run the following commands.

$ defaults write com.apple.Dock appswitcher-all-displays -bool true
$ killall Dock

Changing it back to the default behaviour can be achieved using the following commands.

$ defaults write com.apple.Dock appswitcher-all-displays -bool false
$ killall Dock

found via Show macOS app switcher across all monitors


from around 03:48 in the video:

[...] It's a cool case study because two reasons. 1. it highlights something I say often on the show which is when it comes to organizing work especially in teams start with the process first. What makes the most sense for us to organize our work and then 2. figure out what tools you need to implemented that. [...]

The above quote from the video is basically exact the same thing with which I try to convince people who start solving a problem by focussing on a tool instead of the process. It's always about the process and the people, not about the tooling. The latter can be solved once the processes are defined.


As of yesterday this little blog does support webmentions.

Basically you do have a small form just at the end of every article/note which you can use to send a webmention. Of course it is also possible to send it without the form. Just send it to /api/webmention.


The problem is this: if you use Face ID or Touch ID on your device (and you almost certainly should), what happens if law enforcement (or anyone else for that matter) takes your device and physically forces you to unlock it biometrically? There is some legal precedent supporting the notion that police can force you to do this, but can’t force you to provide them with a passcode or passphrase.

Here are two essential things everyone should know.


... In the emails to developers that surfaced last month, Apple said it would pull apps that had not been updated in a "significant amount of time"—a vague statement that led to the usual developer complaint that Apple's rules appear opaque at best, or arbitrary and capricious at worst. Apple's new press release pulls back the curtain on that policy, at least a little bit. For Apple's purposes, it turns out that a "significant amount of time" specifically means three years. ...

So there has been an update provided by Apple regarding this.


... It’s a hard problem and I can see the upsides of Apple automating the clearing of truly abandoned apps from the App Store, but it seems like there ought to be a way for developers of not-updated-for-a-while apps and games to just log into Apple’s developer portal and hit a button to vouch that they still work and don’t need an update. ...

My guess is that this will become a huge topic in the next weeks because from a developer perspective it doesn't make sense to touch a perfectly fine running piece of software. On the other hand I can also understand why Apple is trying to "clean" the app store. The above quoted suggested compromise could be a good way to handle, in any case a better approach than the one Apple is currently pursuing.